🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 397+ reviews
Home βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

James Allen Ring Box Replacement Red

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.4 out of 5 (397 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$11.61
$19.35
Sale
βœ“ complimentary dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Pre ownedRing box only

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift shipment
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

James Allen Ring Box Replacement Red

Pre owned
Ring box only

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Home products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 323553

Category: Home > Storage & Organization > Jewelry Boxes & Organizers

Original Price: $19.35 USD

Sale Price: $11.61 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 1489 reviews
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Exceeded expectations
Honestly, the James Allen Ring Box Replacement Red works fine and it meets expectations.
46 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid choice
The James Allen Ring Box Replacement Red quality is better than I expected.
37 people found this helpful
KG​
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Detroit, MI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Exceeded expectations
Happy with my James Allen Ring Box Replacement Red purchase.
43 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
finest purchase ever
So far, the James Allen Ring Box Replacement Red works well enough so I’m okay with it.
18 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Denver, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A must-have
Personally, the James Allen Ring Box Replacement Red works well enough which is good enough.
6 people found this helpful